Q

How reliable are HP's new Blade servers?

Hewlett Packard has released a new range of Blade servers, which basically provides the same configuration in terms of CPU speed and memory configuration as other high-end servers, with the exception that it offers IDE drives and IDE interfaces as disk options. Although HP says that they can very well be used as domain controllers, how wise is it to use such Blade servers as Windows 2000 or Windows Server 2003 domain controllers running Active Directory-integrated DNS also? We have an enterprise network consisting of 15,000 user objects, 2,000 global group objects and 8,000 computer objects. Would it perform satisfactorily as compared to a similar server but with Ultra Wide 3 SCSI controller and SCSI hard disk?
Obviously, the system with a faster disk system will operate faster. It will be more noticeable on Windows 2000 since it uses a paging file, even with sufficient RAM. Windows Server 2003 can be configured not to use a paging file when sufficient RAM is present. However, for most applications, a high-speed IDE drive system will be more than sufficient. Plus, it has a lower cost.
This was last published in May 2003

Dig Deeper on Windows Server Monitoring and Administration

PRO+

Content

Find more PRO+ content and other member only offers, here.

Have a question for an expert?

Please add a title for your question

Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.

You will be able to add details on the next page.

Start the conversation

Send me notifications when other members comment.

By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy

Please create a username to comment.

-ADS BY GOOGLE

SearchServerVirtualization

SearchCloudComputing

SearchExchange

SearchSQLServer

SearchWinIT

SearchEnterpriseDesktop

SearchVirtualDesktop

Close