The essential guide to Microsoft Windows Server 2016
A comprehensive collection of articles, videos and more, hand-picked by our editors
A new version of Windows Server is coming, so organizations should do what they can to get a head start on the...
By submitting your personal information, you agree that TechTarget and its partners may contact you regarding relevant content, products and special offers.
upgrade process. Actual justifications and planning will vary dramatically and often depend on each organization's size and needs. But organizations must learn the product early and weigh costs and logistics involved in an upgrade in advance of Microsoft's promised Windows Server 2016 release.
But there are two spheres of discussion here. Should your IT staff master Windows 2016? And should your in-house IT staff have the sole task of installing or upgrading the enterprise to Windows 2016?
There is no question that the IT staff should learn and master Windows Server 2016 along with any relevant systems management tools. Operating systems (OSes) form the foundation of any production environment. OSes include bare metal hypervisors such as VMware ESXi or Hyper-V, along with the OSes on legacy physical servers, OSes on all of your VMs and the OSes shared among container instances. Nothing runs without an OS, so it's critical that in-house IT staff is comfortable with installing, configuring, managing and troubleshooting OSes -- this eventually means Windows 2016.
But positioning an IT staff for Windows Server 2016 isn't free or easy. Learning requires initiative, resources, time and money. The initiative starts from the top -- usually from a CIO or an IT executive -- which outlines the mandate to prepare for a Windows Server 2016 upgrade. Management can facilitate most learning goals by providing a budget and the logistical latitude to set up a dedicated test lab for learning. Existing operating system knowledge is largely transferable, and staff can use technology previews now (and the actual release later) to practice working with Windows 2016 deployments, setups and configurations; they can even see how existing workloads integrate with the new OS. Take notes and share ideas. It's unlikely that an experienced IT staff should need formal training for Windows 2016, but classroom-based training may eventually become available if it's needed.
Calling in the experts
Just because the in-house IT staff should master Windows Server 2016 doesn't necessarily mean that they're the best choice to implement the actual OS upgrade plan in 2016 or beyond. In-house IT staff will probably be adequate for small or midsize organizations with a smaller number of servers or workloads to upgrade.
Your IT staff has a lot to do. There are other pressing projects to work on and many daily fires to fight. Huge OS upgrade projects may be too time-consuming or disruptive for the in-house staff, even when done in smaller phases. Your in-house staff may just need to keep the shop open.
If the scope or complexity of a Windows Server 2016 upgrade is too burdensome for your IT staff, it may be necessary to hire new staff or seek help from qualified consultants or contractors.
Staffing up with temporary talent can mitigate some of that strain, but it might be more effective to engage local value-added resellers or consultants to help with large OS upgrade projects. This allows several senior IT staff to manage the upgrade project and oversee the contractors who possess any additional expertise or workarounds that can be shared with the in-house staff. The expense of a knowledgeable contractor's engagement may prove less costly in terms of a faster, less disruptive OS upgrade process.
Hyper-V features in Windows Server 2016
Windows Server 2016 Group Policy
Windows 2016 preview 2 hits with no containers
OS-based VDI is officially a new feature of Windows Server 2016
Related Q&A from Stephen J. Bigelow
RAID 5 and RAID 6 are two types of erasure coding. The former protects data with basic parity, while the latter builds in a second layer of parity ...continue reading
Cleanly divided and straightforward applications are good candidates for a container-based deployment, whereas complex applications pose more ...continue reading
Assessing the impact of containers on application workloads can be extremely challenging, partially because of how quickly containers are spun up and...continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.