Cluster size default gets an adjustment

Please let us know how useful you find this tip by rating it below. Do you have a useful Windows tip, timesaver or workaround to share? Submit it to our tip contest and you could win a prize!

Although the

    Requires Free Membership to View

default cluster size in Windows Server 2003 NTFS file system is well chosen for average applications, you can improve efficiency for some uses by changing the default.

But keep in mind that if you choose to do this, you need to be familiar with the present and likely future file sizes

Here are a few general guidelines to contemplate as you decide what your cluster size should be.

Should cluster size match smaller files?
In volumes over 3 GB the NTFS cluster size is set to 4K. If the files are usually 4K or less, Microsoft recommends leaving the cluster size alone. Although you might increase theoretical efficiency by reducing the cluster size to match smaller files, you will also increase fragmentation, especially if the files grow to fill more than one cluster.

If the files tend to be large and will probably get larger, Microsoft recommends using 16K or 32K clusters if you do not intend to use NTFS compression.

If you use shadow copy to make point in time copies of the volume for data protection and you plan to defragment the volume, Microsoft recommends using a cluster size of at least 16K. Otherwise, the changes caused by defragmentation can cause shadow copies to be deleted faster than expected.

Microsoft discusses these issues in the Windows Server Deployment Guide. Available on the Microsoft website, the specific URL for this section is: http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/WindowsServ/2003/all/deployguide/en-us/Default.asp?url=/resources/documentation/WindowsServ/2003/all/deployguide/en-us/sdccc_fsv_jzib.asp

Editor's Note: You can receive similar hardware tips twice weekly by subscribing to our Windows Systems and Storage newsletter. Sign up now!

Rick Cook has been writing about mass storage since the days when the term meant an 80K floppy disk. The computers he learned on used ferrite cores and magnetic drums. For the last 20 years he has been a freelance writer specializing in storage and other computer issues.

This was first published in February 2005

There are Comments. Add yours.

TIP: Want to include a code block in your comment? Use <pre> or <code> tags around the desired text. Ex: <code>insert code</code>

REGISTER or login:

Forgot Password?
By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy
Sort by: OldestNewest

Forgot Password?

No problem! Submit your e-mail address below. We'll send you an email containing your password.

Your password has been sent to:

Disclaimer: Our Tips Exchange is a forum for you to share technical advice and expertise with your peers and to learn from other enterprise IT professionals. TechTarget provides the infrastructure to facilitate this sharing of information. However, we cannot guarantee the accuracy or validity of the material submitted. You agree that your use of the Ask The Expert services and your reliance on any questions, answers, information or other materials received through this Web site is at your own risk.