Flash memory devices not ready to serve as OS drives

Serdar Yegulalp, Contributor

To speed boot time, some people have been tempted to substitute flash memory devices for operating system drives. Unfortunately, the way flash devices work makes this prohibitively difficult.

Problem number one is cost. Although flash memory is getting cheaper, a flash drive with the capacity to hold an OS installation would be quite expensive compared to a conventional hard disk. A 4 GB flash drive currently costs approximately $100; a 75 GB Ultra320 SCSI drive from Hitachi currently goes for about $175.

The second issue is transfer speed, which is largely limited by the bus available to the flash device and the interface electronics. Most flash devices seem to top out at around 20 Mb/sec for their read speeds; an enterprise-class hard drive like the above-mentioned SCSI drive can do more than ten times that in both directions.

The third problem with using flash-memory devices as replacements for hard disks is long-term durability. Flash memory is not designed to sustain more than a certain number of write cycles. Most commercial flash-memory products are guaranteed to run for at least 1 million erase/write operations, but there are exceptions to such a norm—so many exceptions, in fact, that it's better to go with technology that has been built from the ground up to support the kind of work involved. Many people believe that flash memory is inherently better than hard drives because of a lack of moving parts. But lack of moving parts

    Requires Free Membership to View

    Login

doesn't make something immune from wear.

On the other hand, a flash device that's been programmed with a bootable image (such as a bootable ISO for an OS distribution) will usually run many times faster than a CD or DVD of the same data. Since this data is typically read-only, the erase/rewrite cycle limitation doesn't come into play here, so this is a legitimately useful application for a flash device. Substituting one for a system hard drive, though, isn't—at least not yet.

Bottom line: As it stands right now, investing in more conventional solutions is a better investment of your time and money.

About the author: Serdar Yegulalp is editor of the Windows Power Users Newsletter. Check it out for the latest advice and musings on the world of Windows network administrators. He is also the author of the book Windows Server Undocumented Solutions.

More information from SearchWinSystems.com


This was first published in June 2006

Join the conversationComment

Share
Comments

    Results

    Contribute to the conversation

    All fields are required. Comments will appear at the bottom of the article.

    Disclaimer: Our Tips Exchange is a forum for you to share technical advice and expertise with your peers and to learn from other enterprise IT professionals. TechTarget provides the infrastructure to facilitate this sharing of information. However, we cannot guarantee the accuracy or validity of the material submitted. You agree that your use of the Ask The Expert services and your reliance on any questions, answers, information or other materials received through this Web site is at your own risk.

    Back to top