I find NTBACKUP to be an acceptable backup tool, especially on Small Business Server 2003 systems.
By submitting your personal information, you agree that TechTarget and its partners may contact you regarding relevant content, products and special offers.
I regularly migrate SBS2003 systems from older hardware platfoms to newer platforms using NTBACKUP as the backup/restore tool. I'm able to perform a migration inside 10 hours, which is about the same amount of time using other tools, as the bulk of the migration process is the same, i.e., over-the-top install to reset the hardware abstraction layer (HAL) and system drivers.
It also means I don't have to purchase additional software or have to learn yet another backup package that invariably either doesn't work properly, or has been horribly misconfigured by the previous administrator.
One of the advantages of NTBACKUP is its ability to restore individual files as well as full systems. With the change in backup in Vista, this is no longer possible, as the backup process is now separated into a file-based backup as well as an image-based backup. This makes it harder to incorporate backup and disaster recovery into the one process. Disaster recovery only works when incorporated into the daily backup operation. If treated as a separate process, it tends to suffer bit rot by the lack of frequent testing and lack of regular updating in terms of process and documentation.
One NTBACKUP process needs streamlining
Really, the only process that needs streamlining in using NTBACKUP as a bare metal recovery process is either bootable media that can write out the backup media contents, or integrating the backup media restore process in the over-the-top install process. Most bare metal recovery products/processes only work with a limited set of hardware changes, or the entire bare metal recovery process becomes so complex that the benefits of simple and fast restores get lost in the buzzword that is called "bare metal recovery."
In summary, NTBACKUP is a free tool that is useful when used appropriately. Like the precepts of good systems administration, it is wise to become familiar with all the tools offered by the operating system. Installing an additional package incurs further cost in terms of time, complexity, maintenance, configuration and security. For example, while I like Vim and Emacs, I'm unlikely to install them on a system where vi is installed and does an adequate job for that system. I only install them when vi becomes inadequate for the task.
But back to Vista. It now looks like that I will have to look for a third-party package, as the flexibility of NTBACKUP has now been lost. Vista -- with its default tools -- now forces me to treat file backup/restore separately from image backup/restore. This to me is a retrograde step.
Rating this tip below will let us know how useful it was to you. And if you have a Windows tip, timesaver or workaround to share, submit it to our tip contest. You could win the prize for that contest.
More information on this topic: