Microsoft Operations Manager 2000 has to deliver on big promises and fill big shoes. The first release of MOM, designed for Windows 2000 and .NET Enterprise Server management, promises to outperform more seasoned management products, such as HP's OpenView, in Windows environments. "MOM is the best tool for managing Windows servers today," said Michael Emmanuel, Microsoft systems management and infrastructure products product manager. In this searchWindowsManageability interview, Emmanuel describes MOM's advantages over "generic" competitors and offers some advice on best practices for rolling out MOM in an enterprise.
| sWM: | What sets MOM apart from other enterprise system similar management products? |
| Emmanuel: | It's architected very specifically for Windows-centric environments. Most other products out there are taking a generic approach to managing the enterprise, building generic management for Unix or Windows. MOM can link into heterogeneous environments, but it focuses on Microsoft environments. Because we're focusing on Windows and the services of Windows, the performance is much higher than generic products can offer on Windows. The knowledge that we can provide about Windows environments is far deeper than generic products can provide. MOM is the best tool for managing Windows servers today. |
Requires Free Membership to View
| sWM: | Can you explain how MOM helps streamline event management? |
| Emmanuel: | If you just monitor events, you have to collect thousands and thousands of events. Just getting events doesn't solve the problem. For example, our own internal IT group has 5,000 servers and can produce millions of events a day. Those events are there in the local event log for future analysis, and that's fine. You don't want to collect these millions of events back at a central point, because you won't be able to see where the problems are. MOM looks at every event as it is generated. Through a set of rules running locally on a machine, MOM can decide if that's an event that should be forwarded to a consolidation point. If the event is forwarded, then more rules determine whether a human should be told about this event. |
| sWM: | What problems that Windows administrators now have are addressed by MOM? |
| Emmanuel: | If a problem is happening all over the network, you can set it so you only get one alert. For example, if a DNS server goes down, everyone using it generates an event. You don't want that to happen on the screen of the human monitoring the system. Instead, the manager wants to see that a particular DNS server is down and these people are affected. |
| sWM: | What's your response to critics who say MOM is not as industrial-strength as other management tools? |
| Emmanuel: | I don't understand that comment. This kind of technology -- MOM and the predecessor to MOM -- is used to manage Microsoft.com, a huge industrial-strength system. Is that a criticism that says MOM doesn't really manage Unix? Well, no, we're not. We are working with partners, so that they can extend MOM to manage outlying regions of Unix from MOM in a Windows-centric environment. |
| sWM: | What is the one most important thing administrators should know about deploying MOM for the first time? |
| Emmanuel: | Planning is everything. This is not a shrink-wrapped product. This is a system. Plan to roll it out the same way you would roll out a mail system. |
FOR MORE INFORMATION
Get the latest Microsoft Operations Manager links
Take the fear factor out of Active Directory deployment
This was first published in September 2001
Enterprise Server Strategies for the CIO
Join the conversationComment
Share
Comments
Results
Contribute to the conversation