USB drive backup: Pros and cons

There are good reasons for Windows administrators to use external USB drives for backup. There are also reasons not to.

Many Windows administrators are wondering whether to use external USB drives – those pocket-sized portable storage...

devices -- for backup.

Here are three reasons to use external USB hard drives for backup --- and three reasons not to.

They're easy to use. Many programs offer one-click backup to USB drives. Installation is also simple: Plug the drive into the USB cable, plug in the power supply (if needed) and let Windows recognize the drive. USB has elaborate software and hardware features to make connecting any USB device just about as foolproof as possible. In addition, most backup software now supports USB devices.

They're cheap. The drives themselves are inexpensive, with street prices for external 250 GB USB drives touching $100 and 500 GB drives available for less than $300. This is less than most entry-level tape drives and there is no additional media cost.

They're flexible. External USB drives are highly portable and can be used to back up several computers on the same drive.

However, there are also valid reasons not to back up to USB hard drives.

They're not a complete backup solution. USB disk backup is best suited to an intermediate level of backup –- somewhere between things like System Restore on Windows XP for quick file recovery and archival storage. With the proper software, USB drives are suited for file recovery. With imaging software, such as Acronis True Image or Norton Ghost, they are very good for recovering from system crashes. But they are not a good choice for long-term storage of data. To take care of your archival needs, you still either need to have a tape drive, or copy your archival data, suitably pruned, onto DVDs or CDs.

They have fixed capacities. Unlike tape or DVD, where a backup can span several tapes or disks, the capacity of a conventional external hard drive is limited. The current maximum capacities of USB external drives – about 500 GB – do not leave a lot of space for even a medium-sized server, especially when you are doing a complete cycle of incremental and full backups. The fixed capacity also means you're putting all your backup eggs in one basket. All your backups, no matter how redundant or how often you do them, are going onto one drive. If it fails, you're in trouble.

They're not cheap. The fixed capacity of external USB drives influences the economics of using them for backup. USB is only cheap if you can fit all the data you need to back up onto a single hard drive. What's more, if you can't (or don't want to) handle archival backup with a built-in CD or DVD drive, you'll have to purchase additional hardware, such as a tape drive.

Bottom line: USB hard drives are best suited for backing up fairly small amounts of data on systems with limited connectivity, such as laptops, desktops and small servers, where archival backup can be handled by the system's built-in DVD or CD drive. For larger amounts of data or more sophisticated requirements, better to use a tape drive or other system.

About the author: Rick Cook specializes in writing about issues related to storage and storage management. 

More information on this topic:


 

This was last published in September 2006

Dig Deeper on Microsoft Windows Data Backup and Protection

PRO+

Content

Find more PRO+ content and other member only offers, here.

Join the conversation

4 comments

Send me notifications when other members comment.

By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy

Please create a username to comment.

this didn't help sorry for the bad feed back. but its true maybe put a table on the page to tell me the pro and cons.
Cancel
A couple of things that I saw in the article.  One, the article stated size and it implied that this was a limiting factor.  I am seeing Mutl-terrabyte USB drives available and I suspect even larger ones are going to available soon.  I do not see size as limiting factor. 

One of the main issues that I see as a con though is so many viruses and malware are written to attack USB Storage and this is a privacy concern.  Once infected, you have constantly be scanning the device for viruses / malware.  A lot of companies do not allow USB storage devices for this reason, and so they are turned off on the local machine for this reason, and for privacy concerns.  This is something that I see all the time.

Years ago, this once was known as sneaker-net in reference to the floppy disks, but it is still very valid now with USB drives. 
Cancel
OK article. Another con in my opinion is speed. They can be slow. I personally picked up a 4TB drive for just over $120. More than enough for most people to use for backing up. You just need to be patient.
Cancel
I use USB HD for EOM Archiveing and I only attach this drive to the server
Cancel

-ADS BY GOOGLE

SearchServerVirtualization

SearchCloudComputing

SearchExchange

SearchSQLServer

SearchWinIT

SearchEnterpriseDesktop

SearchVirtualDesktop

Close