Can Active Directory tombstones cause problems with AD restoration?
To ensure proper replication between domain controllers, deleted objects are first converted into special objects called "tombstones."
As changes to Active Directory (AD) are replicated between domain controllers, the tombstones are also replicated -- effectively deleting the same objects on other domain controllers. However, tombstones take up space in storage, so they are given a finite lifetime and finally deleted from disk once their lifetime expires (60 days by default).
Active Directory tombstones can cause data consistency problems for AD restoration. If a domain controller is restored to state before an object was deleted, and a tombstone for that deleted object is not replicated to the restored controller (e.g., the tombstone for that object had already expired), then that old object will remain on the restored domain controller and cause severe AD problems. In actual practice, AD may prevent restoration if the backup is older than the tombstone lifetime.
This puts the onus on administrators to ensure domain controllers are backed up at least as frequently as tombstone lifetimes. As a rule, domain controllers should be backed up at least twice within the tombstone lifetime to help ensure all tombstones are available for proper replication to restored domain controllers.
IT administrators must understand how Active Directory iterations are coordinated and maintained, and domain controllers require careful protection using tools designed to accommodate those unique behaviors. Improper backup and restoration can easily result in data consistency and rollback issues that spell catastrophe for the enterprise. It's important to select adequate backup tools for the job, test those tools thoroughly, use the tools frequently, and implement restoration processes that will ensure continued domain controller operation.
Dig Deeper on Windows systems and network management
Related Q&A from Stephen J. Bigelow
Full virtualization and paravirtualization both enable hardware resource abstraction, but the two technologies differ when it comes to isolation ... Continue Reading
Organizations can cap their hyper-converged infrastructure costs when they deploy the Azure Stack HCI platform, but once they plug into the cloud, ... Continue Reading
You can implement ESXi on ARM -- or other RISC processors -- in micro and nano data centers. A nano data center is more specialized but also more ... Continue Reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.