News Stay informed about the latest enterprise technology news and product updates.

Tech Roundup: NAS hardware

More than just a cheaper alternative to a SAN, the NAS hardware market is being driven by innovative technologies such as file virtualization and grid storage.

NAS is growing more and more popular for companies that are consolidating file servers for easier administration than that of a SAN. The two big advantages of NAS are administrative cost savings and the ability to share files across a network.

NAS hardware are file servers that are connected to an Ethernet network and communicate to servers using the protocols NFS (Unix, Linux) and CIFS (Windows).

This Tech Roundup discusses how NAS hardware is used and how it is evolving.


According to, NAS is hard disk storage that is set up with its own network address rather than being attached to the department computer.

NAS consists of hard disk storage and software for mapping file locations to the network-attached device. NAS can be a step toward and included as part of a SAN.

NAS hardware comes in the form of a standalone file server or a NAS head. A NAS standalone system includes a NAS controller and a storage array. Data is stored in CIFS or NFS file systems and can be shared across networks. A NAS head – also known as a NAS gateway – provides a NAS controller, but customers use existing storage arrays for disk capacity. With a NAS head, users can use part of an array for NAS and the rest of the array for SAN-based storage.

Key vendors and products

There are many players in the NAS hardware market: the most well-known being Network Appliance Inc. and EMC Corp. Vendors such as Adaptec Inc. (which recently acquired Snap Appliance), Dell Inc. and Procom Technology are serving the lower end of the NAS market.

According to Tony Asaro, senior analyst at Enterprise Strategy Group, Milford, Mass., the NAS market is rife with startups developing unique technologies. He mentioned BlueArc Corp., with its scalable Titan Silicon Storage Server and Isilon Systems Inc., with its Isilon IQ appliance and clustered network architecture. Asaro also highlighted Silicon Graphics Inc., ONStor Inc., Exanet, Polyserve Inc. and Panasas Inc. as emerging NAS players that offer scalable file systems.

Who's not keeping up in NAS? "The folks that are slipping include large storage vendors like HDS, HP, IBM and Sun," Asaro said. "In many cases, these vendors have a decent revenue stream compared to the emerging vendors and startups, but given their positions in the market, they all should be doing much better."

Innovations and trends

Recent innovations around NAS, according to Asaro, are the ability to create clusters of more than two controllers and allowing users to scale as needed. Another innovation is the scalability of the file systems themselves. This is where startups with scalable file systems have an advantage, Asaro said.

"Traditional NAS vendors like NetApp and EMC are limited to 16 terabytes (TB) and 2 TB, respectively, while newer systems can scale to 100 TB file systems and beyond," he said.

Randy Kerns, senior partner at the Evaluator Group, Greenwood Village, Colo., sees innovation coming from NetApp's acquisition of Spinnaker, whose SpinOS distributed operating system allows users to manage multiple NAS boxes like they are one box. "This is a unique opportunity to move NAS to a grid storage approach," he said.

In a similar vein, Asaro points to file virtualization as an up-and-coming NAS innovation, with Acopia Networks Inc. and Rainfinity as two vendors making noise in this space. "With file virtualization, users can aggregate multiple file systems with existing NAS systems for better performance and easier management," Asaro said.

Kerns added that vendors are putting TCP/IP accelerators (offload engines) into NAS boxes to improve performance and most now have point-in-time copy and remote copy features.

One key area in NAS that is still developing, according to Kerns, is the use of global namespaces to manage multiple file servers under one umbrella.

This article orginally appeared on

Dig Deeper on Windows Server storage management

Start the conversation

Send me notifications when other members comment.

Please create a username to comment.